Cbcb:Pop-Lab:TODO: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
==AMOScmp== | ==AMOScmp== | ||
* integrate other aligners - Daniela has a preliminary pipeline that works with SOAP but why not Bowtie? A solution would be to allow inputs in BAM format. | * integrate other aligners - Daniela has a preliminary pipeline that works with SOAP but why not Bowtie? A solution would be to allow inputs in BAM format. | ||
== Bambus 2 == | |||
* Handle scaffolds better than currently done (now the code uses "contigs" instead of scaffolds) | |||
* Write good documentation and put together pipelines for various types of data and underlying assemblers |
Latest revision as of 00:36, 16 June 2010
AMOS
- Create "group" object to sub-cluster sequences/contigs/scaffolds/etc
- Remove iid concept - keep bid and let message files use eids for cross-referencing. this will allow the merging of files
- Remove the layout objects - equivalent with contig without a sequence
- New way to store sequence data targeted at short sequences for which it's too verbose to store names and such
- figure out a way to handle 454 mate-pairs, esp. in hawkeye
- build a better 'toAmos'
Note: some progress in these directions has been made but the changes need to be cleaned up.
AMOScmp
- integrate other aligners - Daniela has a preliminary pipeline that works with SOAP but why not Bowtie? A solution would be to allow inputs in BAM format.
Bambus 2
- Handle scaffolds better than currently done (now the code uses "contigs" instead of scaffolds)
- Write good documentation and put together pipelines for various types of data and underlying assemblers