Cbcb:Pop-Lab:TODO: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==AMOS== | |||
* Create "group" object to sub-cluster sequences/contigs/scaffolds/etc | * Create "group" object to sub-cluster sequences/contigs/scaffolds/etc | ||
* Remove iid concept - keep bid and let message files use eids for cross-referencing. this will allow the merging of files | * Remove iid concept - keep bid and let message files use eids for cross-referencing. this will allow the merging of files | ||
Line 4: | Line 5: | ||
* New way to store sequence data targeted at short sequences for which it's too verbose to store names and such | * New way to store sequence data targeted at short sequences for which it's too verbose to store names and such | ||
* figure out a way to handle 454 mate-pairs, esp. in hawkeye | * figure out a way to handle 454 mate-pairs, esp. in hawkeye | ||
* build a better 'toAmos' | |||
Note: some progress in these directions has been made but the changes need to be cleaned up. | |||
==AMOScmp== | |||
* integrate other aligners - Daniela has a preliminary pipeline that works with SOAP but why not Bowtie? A solution would be to allow inputs in BAM format. |
Revision as of 00:35, 16 June 2010
AMOS
- Create "group" object to sub-cluster sequences/contigs/scaffolds/etc
- Remove iid concept - keep bid and let message files use eids for cross-referencing. this will allow the merging of files
- Remove the layout objects - equivalent with contig without a sequence
- New way to store sequence data targeted at short sequences for which it's too verbose to store names and such
- figure out a way to handle 454 mate-pairs, esp. in hawkeye
- build a better 'toAmos'
Note: some progress in these directions has been made but the changes need to be cleaned up.
AMOScmp
- integrate other aligners - Daniela has a preliminary pipeline that works with SOAP but why not Bowtie? A solution would be to allow inputs in BAM format.