Cbcb:Pop-Lab:TODO: Difference between revisions

From Cbcb
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
==AMOS==
* Create "group" object to sub-cluster sequences/contigs/scaffolds/etc
* Create "group" object to sub-cluster sequences/contigs/scaffolds/etc
* Remove iid concept - keep bid and let message files use eids for cross-referencing.  this will allow the merging of files
* Remove iid concept - keep bid and let message files use eids for cross-referencing.  this will allow the merging of files
Line 4: Line 5:
* New way to store sequence data targeted at short sequences for which it's too verbose to store names and such
* New way to store sequence data targeted at short sequences for which it's too verbose to store names and such
* figure out a way to handle 454 mate-pairs, esp. in hawkeye
* figure out a way to handle 454 mate-pairs, esp. in hawkeye
* build a better 'toAmos'
Note: some progress in these directions has been made but the changes need to be cleaned up.
==AMOScmp==
* integrate other aligners - Daniela has a preliminary pipeline that works with SOAP but why not Bowtie? A solution would be to allow inputs in BAM format.

Revision as of 00:35, 16 June 2010

AMOS

  • Create "group" object to sub-cluster sequences/contigs/scaffolds/etc
  • Remove iid concept - keep bid and let message files use eids for cross-referencing. this will allow the merging of files
  • Remove the layout objects - equivalent with contig without a sequence
  • New way to store sequence data targeted at short sequences for which it's too verbose to store names and such
  • figure out a way to handle 454 mate-pairs, esp. in hawkeye
  • build a better 'toAmos'

Note: some progress in these directions has been made but the changes need to be cleaned up.

AMOScmp

  • integrate other aligners - Daniela has a preliminary pipeline that works with SOAP but why not Bowtie? A solution would be to allow inputs in BAM format.