Trace formatting: Difference between revisions

From Cbcb
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 69: Line 69:
   * about 36 hours for a run
   * about 36 hours for a run
   * each sequence is up to 36 bases long
   * each sequence is up to 36 bases long
SRA: set of 4 files
  *_seq.txt  : lane,run, well(x,y) sequence
  *_prb.txt  : max quality from each group of 4 values is taken as quality
  *_sig2.txt : lane,run, well(x,y); max signal from each group of 4 values corresponds to max quality
  *_qhg.txt  : lane,run, well(x,y); some encoded info?
Qualities:
  Range : -5..40
  Avg  : ~25, depending on the data set
=== Fastq format ===


Example:
Example:
   1 lane of Solexa reads: 10,959 READS; all are 36 bp
   1 lane of Solexa reads: 10,959 READS; all are 36 bp
   $ /fs/sz-user-supported/common/packages/io_lib-x86_64/bin/solexa2srf s_8_0100_seq.txt  ; mv traces.srf  s_8_0100.srf
   $ /fs/sz-user-supported/common/packages/io_lib-x86_64/bin/solexa2srf s_8_0100_seq.txt  ; mv traces.srf  s_8_0100.srf

Revision as of 20:07, 25 February 2008

Sanger

454 (single reads)

Anomalies:

 * homopolymer lengths can be shorter than real
 * substitutions less likely than in traditional methodssingle base insertions
 * carry forward events usually near but not adjacent to homopolymers

GS20

 Plate information
 * 1.6M total wells
 * 450K detactable wells
 * 200K usable wells
 Accuracy:
 * published per-base accuracy of a Roche GS20 is only 96%.
 * Mitch Sogin paper
   * 99.5% accuracy rate in unassembled sequences
   * identified several factors that can be used to remove a small percentage of low-quality reads, improving the accuracy to 99.75% or better => better quality than Sanger sequencing
   * The error rate, defined as the number of errors (miscalled bases plus inserted and deleted bases) divided by the total number of expected bases, was 0.49%
  * 36% insertions, 27% delitions, 21% N's, 16% substitutions
  * A to G and T to C, were more frequent than other mismatches
  * reverse transitions, G to A and C to T, were not that frequent 
  * Nearly 70% of the homopolymer extensions were A/T
  * errors were evenly distributed along the length of the reference sequences, they were not evenly distributed

among reads: 82% had no errors, 93% had no more than a single error, and 96% had no more than 2 errors.

  * A small number of reads, fewer than 2%, contained a disproportionate number of errors that account for nearly 50% of the miscalls for the entire dataset  
  * Avg quality is 25; in homopolymers can drop as low as 5
  * Reads much longer than avg length had more errors
  * strong correlation between the presence of ambiguous base calls and other errors in a read
  * The presence of even a single ambiguous base in a read correlates strongly with the presence of other errors 
  * Primer errors also correlated with errors

454 (paired ends)

Features:

 * approximately 84-nucleotide DNA fragments 
 * have a ~ 44-mer linker sequence in the middle 
 * flanked by a ~ 20-mer sequence on each side. 
 * The two flanking 20-mers are segments of DNA that were originally located approximately 2.5 kb apart in the genome of interest.  
 * The ordering and orienting of contigs generates scaffolds which provide a high-quality draft sequence of the genome.

Anomalies:

 * the linker can appear (tandem,completely/partially) more than once

Links:

 1_paired_end.pdf

Solexa/Illumina

Links:

 Strep suis Solexa data set for download at Sanger
 NCBI Solexa example data set
 ismb2007Poster.pdf
 Smith_Rennes_2007.pdf

Software:

 Staden & Io_lib
 * IO_LIB package /fs/sz-user-supported/common/packages/io_lib-1.11-x86_64/bin/
 * STADEN package /fs/sz-user-supported/common/packages/staden-src-1-7-0/distrib/unix-rel-1-7-0/linux-bin
 
 MAQ Sanger assembler
 FASTQ sequence format

Illumina 1G :

 * ~40 Million DNA sequencing reactions
 * about 36 hours for a run
 * each sequence is up to 36 bases long

SRA: set of 4 files

 *_seq.txt  : lane,run, well(x,y) sequence
 *_prb.txt  : max quality from each group of 4 values is taken as quality
 *_sig2.txt : lane,run, well(x,y); max signal from each group of 4 values corresponds to max quality
 *_qhg.txt  : lane,run, well(x,y); some encoded info?


Qualities:

 Range : -5..40
 Avg   : ~25, depending on the data set

Fastq format

Example:

 1 lane of Solexa reads: 10,959 READS; all are 36 bp
 $ /fs/sz-user-supported/common/packages/io_lib-x86_64/bin/solexa2srf s_8_0100_seq.txt  ; mv traces.srf  s_8_0100.srf
 $ /fs/sz-user-supported/common/packages/io_lib-x86_64/bin/srf2fastq s_8_0100.srf > s_8_0100.fastq

   @s_8_100_293_551
   CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCACC
   +
   IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
   @s_8_100_35_698
   TATATGATTGACAATATAAAAATATGAGTATAAAAT
   +
   IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII4/:I
   @s_8_100_880_947
   TTATTATCTTTATTGACGTACCTCTAGAAGACCCAA
   +
   IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII;>1
   ...
 Edge effect: 
 N's have quality -14
 $ cat s_8_0100_seq.txt | sort -nk3 -nk4 
 8       100     0       37      ......AT.AT...TAATCAATA..GA.GAAG....
 ...
 8       100     1003    959     AGTC.......T.C.........GT.........AA
 $ more traces.qual
 ...
 >s_8_100_0_37
 -14 -14 -14 -14 -14 -14 25 13 -14 25 25 -14 -14 -14 25 25 25 25 22 25 25 25 25 -14 -14 25 25 -14 25 -11 25 14 -14 -14 -14 -14 
 ...
 >s_8_100_1003_959
 25 25 25 25 -14 -14 -14 -14 -14 -14 -14 25 -14 25 -14 -14 -14 -14 -14 -14 -14 -14 -14 25 -10 -14 -14 -14 -14 -14 -14 -14 -14 -14 8 25
 ...
 # bioperl script to convrt seq formats
 $ seqconvert.PLS --from fastq --to fasta < s_8_0100.fastq
 
 # get fastq qualities
 $ more *fastq | grep -A 1 "^+" | grep -v ^+ | grep -v -- ^-- | perl -ane '@F=split //,$F[0]; foreach (@F) { $n=ord($_)-33; print $n," ";} print "\n";'